A shorter version of this article was previously published in Dutch in the magazine ‘Gezond Verstand‘ (Common Sense) no. 12, March 24, 2021
Elze van Hamelen
When after the liberation in 1945 the realization about the horrors of the War slowly dawned in the public’s consioussness, this resulted in a call for justice. Strictly speaking, the nazi’s did not act out illegal acts – the actions of the nazi-regime where legal under its own laws, just like the corona measures are currently legalized by means of enabling acts. Therefore, special militairy courts, based on international law, were instituted, such as the famous Nuremberg Tribunals. During these tribunals, where a selection of high-level nazi’s stood for trial, details came out about experiments of nazi-doctors on human subjects.
Principles for ethical practice of medicine
The Nuremberg principles, that provide a foundation for ethical medical research, were a result of these trials. The principles require voluntary informed consent of test subjects. Voluntary – meaning without coercion, force, blackmail or manipulation. Being informed means that the subject is fully aware of the risks that are involved in the experiment. In the current age, where the medical sector has been captured by the political system to provide justification for the rollout of totalitarian policies, we would do well to remember this history. The doctor’s oath to not do harm, and the Nuremberg principles should work as a protection to repeat history.
What this government is doing, is not rightful. We cannot consider this as mismanagement. In my opinion, the persons who are responsible will have to justify themselves in a criminal court. This also applies to those who enable these policies – Jeroen Pols, lawyer on behalf of VirusWaarheid (Virus Truth)
Parallels between 1933-1945 and the current time
There are more parallels between the period 1933-1945 and the current era: weak minority goverments, neutralizing of parliament, an enabling act, and the transformation of media into pure propaganda. When then terror was executed by SA troops in the streets, this time a meek subservience is created by the invisible terror of the virus.
New Nuremberg trials in preparation
Under the leadership of the American-German lawyer Reiner Fuellmich, who has previously successfully litigated against tegen Volkswagen and the Deutsche Bank, and who is supported by an international team of lawyers, new Nuremberg trials are currently in preparation. In hearings conducted by the Berlin Commission of Inquiry around a 100 internationally renownded scientists, doctors, economists and lawyers have provided testimony. From these hearings dr. Fuellmich draws the conclusion: “[the hearings have] shown with a probability close to certainty that the Covid- 19 scandal was at no time a health issue.”
Changing nature of the ‘supreme international crime’
During the first Nuremberg Trial, the first deed of agression – starting a war with another country – was deemed ‘the supreme international crime’, because this act contained within it the seed of all accumulated evil that followed out of the war. This time the war is conducted by stealth – despite semi-permanent lockdowns, curfews, and erosion of civil rights, many do not consider themselves as being in a war. This time around, the seed of evil is not an act of agression – instead, it is The Lie. A web of lies has slowly but surely spun itself around us – lies about lethality, infection rates, death counts, efficacy or damage of measures, and ‘contagion’. However, there is one cardinal lie with which the whole edifice stands firm or collapsies. Fuellmich traces this lie to the PCR test protocol as it was published by Dr. Drosten. Without a fraudulent PCR test, there is no ‘pandemic’.
“Ís it not said that in peacetime the chiefs of staff alwasy prepare their armies as well as possible – for the previous war?” – Sebastian Haffner p83
The necessity to confront reality before we can chart inroads to constructive, liveable solutions
Since the second World War a system has evolved in which there exists an official narrative, which you can read in the newspapers, that is increasingly divorced from material reality. In an interview in 2004, the neoconservative Karl Rove from the Bush cabinet explained to NYT journalist Ron Suskind: [you are] in what we call the reality-based community,” which he defined as people who “believe that solutions emerge from your judicious study of discernible reality.” … “That’s not the way the world really works anymore,” he continued. “We’re an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality.” Back then, this seem strange and somewhat megalomaniac. However, looking back at the last 20 years, this remark contained quite some veracity. The current time is mostly an information war – and to fight it we will need to get to the truth thread by thread. Not just the truth about covid – but about the real structures of power that are ruling us.
“I believe that despite the enormous odds which exist, unflinching, unswerving, fierce intellectual determination, as citizens, to define the real truth of our lives and our societies is a crucial obligation which devolves upon us all. It is in fact mandatory. If such a determination is not embodied in our political vision we have no hope of restoring what is so nearly lost to us – the dignity of man”.
Harold Pinter, Nobel prize acceptance speech, 2005